Marching onward with my discipleship book and stuff, if there was ever a chapter that outlined in a most confusing, yet strangly clarifying, way the Trinity of God, it's Hebrews 1.
The chapter I'm working on deals with the deity of Christ. It said to read Hebrews 1 for evidence of that. What I find interesting about the chapter are not the multiple references to Jesus being God, but the Who that is describing Jesus' deity.
Granted, Paul wrote this, but you have to go on the belief that all Scripture is inspired by and practically written by God Himself. Even the really weird mundane details such as geneologies.
Anyway, God the Father says to Jesus, God the Son:
"You are my Son;
today I have become your Father"?
Or again,
"I will be his Father,
and he will be my Son"?
6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says,
"Let all God's angels worship him."
7 In speaking of the angels he says,
"He makes his angels spirits,
and his servants flames of fire."
8 But about the Son he says,
"Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever;
a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy."
10 He also says,
"In the beginning, Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11 They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12 You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end."
13 To which of the angels did God ever say,
"Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet"?
God the Father calls God the Son "God", "Lord" and basically "Creator". Then He says stuff like "God, your God". Really, utterly confusing and yet clarifying at the same time.
Do God and Jesus just have the same name of "God", and "Jesus" is like a derivative of "Junior" ("you were named for the dog?")? No, the Bible holds clear evidence that Jesus has his own names - "wonderful counselor, Prince of Peace, etc." and that God Himself has his own names - "Abba, Jehovah, etc."
So really, there are two separate individuals here who share the same base of power - omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient.
The one verse from the entire passage that clarifies this for me (and I don't know if this is clear to anyone else, I could be writing in mud for all I know) is this:
"The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven."
The reason why all this came up is because of this question in the book: "Jesus' superiority to the angels is shown by..."
I don't know that I actually answered that question (mostly because it was so basic -I mean, Gabriel comes down to earth and scares the crap out of a bunch of shepherds, or was it Michael, anyway, another angel stands in the middle of a river and has this dialogue with Joshua, Gabriel tells Mary she's pregnant - angels have this long history of scaring people with "tidings". Jesus eased his way into things - already, He's way ahead of the curve.), but I was struck by the idea that Jesus is the exact representation of God's being.
We, as human beings, are made in the image of God. But we are not exact representations of God. We have attributes and connection to God, but I don't believe God looks anything like me - two eyes, two arms, two legs, torso, etc. I have an easier time understanding my soul to be the image of God in that it feels things on a much, much smaller scale than God would feel; it is subject to eternity as defined and demonstrated by God. But I am not a physically manifested exact representation of God.
Angels are not an exact representation of God either. In fact, based on the descriptions of angels in Revelations, I would go so far as to say that we as human beings are more representative of God than angels. I believe that angels are like slightly overprocessed Xerox copies of God - a two-dimensional idea of God, if you will, because they only possess one or two of His attributes, whereas we as humans possess a full range of what God's characteristics are like.
Angels are limited in what they can do. The majority of them don't have free will. Lucifer was different and you could say that he may have been the prototype for human beings in that he was given the option to choose. He chose to go his own way and is the plague that haunts us all. Lucifer is also not an exact representation of God, in that God cannot contradict Himself. I think an additional reason why I believe Lucifer was a prototype is that God, in deciding to create something with free will and then imbuing that creation with His breath, i.e. His image, also realized that that creation needed to be in its own place to really be of free will. Hence, earth.
We don't know that Lucifer wouldn't have made a different decision had he not been constantly surrounded by heaven and the presence of God. Kind of like kids who grow up in a loving home that turn to all manner of unloving things. But I don't believe Lucifer received the breath/image of God - not like us. Free will is not the image of God. Free will is a gift from God. God Himself has less free will than we do. He cannot be evil. And we are grateful for that. Our free will doesn't make us better than God by any stretch of the imagination, but it does make us better than the angels in that we willingly come to God and cast our crowns before Him, bow at his feet, and sing Holy Holy Holy is the Lord God Almighty. We were not created with our sole funtion being to do only that. We were created with many functions and we have the ability to make that task of praising God one of our functions.
But I digress. Anyway, Jesus is the exact representation of God's being and is the radiance of God's glory.
First of all, just rest in the awesome verbology of that description. I remember one day where a co-worker complimented me. I was working through a horribly painful phase in my life, but had that one day of clarity. I had spent the morning just reading my Bible, praying, listening to some Delirious, and just really feeling close to God. I went into work, and she came up to me and said "You look different today. I don't know what it is, but I want to say that you look radiant. You are radiant."
I knew I felt radiant, but I had no idea that it was reflected on my face that other people could see it. I remember being curious (not vain - maybe vain now, since I am aware of it, but not vain in that moment) and looking in the mirror and marveling at the fact that my face was glowing. I didn't see any definition of my features, only this glow. More than that, I remember how I felt that day. As if no darkness in the world could ever diminish the clarity and joy I owned. That I had no doubts, no fears, no troubles and no pain. That my life here on earth was just a temporary way station until I could fully be in the presence of God, and this was just a taste of what that was going to be like full-time.
That experience allows me to understand the truth of what it means to call the Son of God "the radiance of God's glory." There is no darkness in the world that could diminish that clarity, joy, and truth of what He is. There is no eclipse to blot out that radiance. I can not describe my own experience except to say that the most overwhelming of all the feelings I could define was clarity. Not in what I was going to be doing with my life, or who I would marry, or even what the next five minutes were going to look like, but clarity in that "I know whom I have believed and I am convinced." Nothing else mattered that day except to hold onto that clarity as long as possible. The radiance of God's glory is that - clarity. Not a happy happy joy joy feeling of leaping over tall buildings in a single bound, or feelings of worthlessness and despair, but unadulturated, undramatized, unarrogant clarity and confidence. The kind of clarity that allows one to accept both the fact that they are unholy and yet fully able to receive God's love.
Jesus being the exact representation of God's being does not mean that He replaces God or is a diluted form of God. The dictionary defines "representation" often as being on behalf of something.
That is what Jesus did - he came to earth on behalf of God the Father, as His representative. But the dictionary also says:
9. presentation to the mind, as of an idea or image.
10. a mental image or idea so presented; concept.
11. the act of portrayal, picturing, or other rendering in visible form.
Jesus on earth was also the presentation of what God's image on earth should actually look like. Not on the outside - Jesus wasn't pretty, or glamorous, or any of those things. But from the inside, He presented to us a mental image of what God would have us be as those created in His image. Holy, just, righteous, pursuing Him, compassionate, etc.
Xerox copies are just copies of what is already in existance. A clone does the same thing. But a representative is someone who has their own attributes and stake in life, but chooses to take on the responsibilities of someone else. To us, Jesus is God with a filter known as the cross. Everything that Abba Father would say to us, Jesus says with grace and compassion. Everything that Abba Father would do to us, Jesus says He's already allowed to happen to him.
The book asked "In Heb. 1:3, what encourages you about Jesus' ability to reveal God?"
Representatives reveal that which might not otherwise be seen. I wrote that Jesus, while being the radiance of God's glory, is accessible to me, whereas Abba Father may not be because of my unholy state. Through the Rep., I can touch, taste, see, feel, experience the love of God in various forms without fear, blood sacrifice, or being struck down by lightening. It doesn't mean that I'm not in awe. But it does mean that I'm allowed.